17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com> writes:
Note that in a number of "regulatory" first amendment cases, the appeals courts decided in favor of the government while the Supremes voted unanimously in favor of freedom of communication. Sometimes you have to make it up the ladder.
Pardon my cynicism, but I think I know why. These little judges really, really, want to be appointed Supremes. So they aren't likely to rule in a fashion which will threaten the potential interests of a current or future US president. Since the natural goal of government is to accrue power, there seems to be a safe prediction of what those future interests will be. Lyle Transarc 707 Grant Street 412 338 4474 The Gulf Tower Pittsburgh 15219