I think it's rather odd to find cypherpunks basically flaming someone because they choose to use a pseudonym instead of their real name. Or presuming guilt of being Detweiler because of the choice to use the pseudonym. Isn't the right to hide one's official on-your-passport identity something that we all supposedly support? Seems kind of contrary to this goal to go making anyone who exercises this right feel unwelcome on the list. I'm sure if someone had mailed this sue person, and politey explained why they felt her posts to be inappropriate, she would have changed her behavior. And if she didn't, _then_ you could try to make her feel as unwelcome as possible. Sure, this plan of action means that Detweiler-spoofs are a bit more effective, and detweiler identities will take a bit longer to be "outed". And preventing the clipper chip from becoming a standard means that drug dealers will have a bit of an easier time, especially if we succeed in making PGP standard. Or terrorists. Such is the cost of being fair. I think it's awfully hypocritical to judge this pseudonomous person harshly merely because of her pseudonimity, or because that pseudonimity makes you suspect she's really detweiler.