At 02:11 AM 11/24/95 -0500, futplex wrote:
sameer writes:
I am working on a spec which myself and others will turn into an internet draft, for placements on the standards track. It will standardize remailer commands and nymserver commands, and will incorporate payment. Once we get a draft written up it will be posted for review, flames, and criticism.
Great -- I've been toying with working on exactly that since the summer. I never quite convinced myself that a) the general net community would really take a remailer-related i-draft or RFC seriously, or even that b) the remailer community would really find a standards document useful. It's encouraging to see that some other people also think it's worth writing.
Now, if the remailer service-listing operators could agree on a standard format for their reporting (lag time, feature lists, etc), then it would simplify maintaining a list of remailers - which would increase the usability of the remailer system, and help the use and growth of remailers. Dave Merriman This is a test (3 UUE lines) of the unconstitutional ITAR - 1/713th of the PGP executable. See below for getting YOUR chunk! ------------------ PGP.ZIP Part [015/713] ------------------- M=$<(&L`#*IPP",(G6(,,S,`P](<2RWU96XCW86/JBYV8A\D8@X'HB_9H#&\X MX'PCUB.,13B"X8`R?^J-:UB.M_`U\>[#)BS&5$0C,Y#^1CS>1`\T1QTXX6!3 M8H,),S$8G>&.WP(8IRA`-M['+`Q%&_C"">5-F%LX@<_Q$;*P'',Q$Z/AA[8M ------------------------------------------------------------- for next chunk to export --> http://dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/export/ <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> My web page: http://www.geopages.com/CapitolHill/1148