Futplex writes:
Matt Blaze writes: # It seems best to encourage the realistic side of NSA as much as possible...
James Donald writes:
Why? Surely the realists are more dangerous than the nuts.
One way to look at it is this:
Could a Nutty NSA carry out its Nutty Agenda ?
I'd like to say the following: I don't think the NSA is inherently the enemy at all. Signals intelligence and protecting the U.S. and its citizens from signals intelligence is probably necessary. As a radical libertarian, I'd like to see these activities carried out in the private sector, but thats another story. The real problem with the NSA is the same as the problem with the FBI re: digital telephony. They've gotten used to a certain model of how the world works and rather than adapt to new times where most people have access to strong crypto, they have decided to use the laws to try to retard the inevitable. I'm sure some NSA types are listening, so let me say this: there is no way on earth to stop the progress of a technology who's time has come. I've heard an idiot from the FBI actually say in public, in response to statements that the vast amount of open literature makes it impossible to stop bright 14 year olds from writing good crypto code, that "we aren't going to just accept this". Well, go off and accept reality, folks. You can't stop strong cryptography from being in the hands of the public. What you can do, however, is cost the nation and the world billions if not trillions in damage. If crypto had been in cellphone signaling equipment earlier billions in stolen cellphone calls would have been saved -- ditto for credit card systems. All you can succeed in doing is leeching the economy white while trying to save a model that is doomed. You can't stop strong crypto any more than the horseshoe makers could stop the automobile. Learn to live with a new model for how you work now, and you will save years of bitter and futile agony for everyone. Perry