I am trying to understand the arguments for these points of view... I consider myself to be extremely "liberal" in my political philosophy, and I have a lot of respect for the arguments of libertarians. But I am continually pulled back to the "test case" issue of racist employment practices. This is the case where the argument is most difficult for me to buy. I am not sure whether Blanc would hold that businesses should be free to engage in racist hiring policies if that is their decision, but it seems clear that Tim May does hold this position, and I understand that this is in fact the classic libertarian position. The argument seems to be that in a free society, natural cooperative processes will provide a form of "autoregulation" to discourage the widespread development of oppression of specific classes of individuals.
So, what gives you the right to stick your nose into other peoples business practices. I believe that if I hire a person to do some task it should be my decision as to what sort of person I hire as it is my money that I am paying them and my business that suffers if I am forced into hiring someone based on something other than good business reasons.
Organizations such as the KKK could accrue the financial support of large numbers of members to create strong social and economic pressures to oppress segments of the population in specific areas, yet the source of these pressures may be impossible to trace.
The same could be said about the Democratic Party in the USA.
If there is a reason why these concerns are unfounded, I would very much appreciate hearing refutations. I certainly don't want any of these possibilities to materialize, but I don't see any way around them in a completely "cryptoanarchic" society.
I think that it would be a Healthy Change instead of the crap that you seem to perfer.