17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
WARNING: the word "crypto" does not appear in this post (aside from the this warning message). jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
I have added a pornographic image to my web site as an act of real civil disobedience. I urge others to do the same.
Yawn. I'd would not call it pornographic. Indecent (legalise), yeah. Porn? No. Don't make the same erroneous distinctions that the pro-CDA folx make...
In the course of doing this, I discovered that on windows, Netscape makes jpegs of naked pretty girls look like crap.
It would take much longer to process the image without dithering of some sort. Displaying jpegs in high quality is CPU intensive.