At 02:46 PM 9/7/95 -0400, dmandl@panix.com wrote:
And once the interface improves...
...I won't have to deal with the inefficiencies of real sex, live music performances, or (non-virtual) world travel ever again.
Actually, the creation of separate "spaces" that can only be entered with your (each person's) permission will have a big impact on life in the real world.
Dave. Sorry you didn't catch the implied change of tone in the above. I meant to show a switch from Space Cadet rhetoric about the nets to a more realistic view.
And once the interface improves...
Actually, the creation of separate "spaces" that can only be entered with your (each person's) permission
These separate spaces won't wipe out the Real World (used with permission) but they will influence it as a form of private property that is self enforcing neither dependent on force for protection nor capable of being penetrated by force. This is a BIG THING. You can't live in it yet but you will certainly be able to trade digital goods and services there and stash digital goods (work product, databases, etc.). Having a place that is under your exclusive control has enormous practical and psychological implications. Think of the change that occurred when peasants came to be able to own land. Cyberspace contains spaces that can be cheaply created, individually owned, and free of confiscation. And since the bulk of the wealth of OECD countries is non-physical (consisting of various forms of ownership rights and "choses in action") that wealth can be protected cryptographically.
I've got to tell you, Duncan, this kind of rhetoric pushes me over to the luddite side more every day.
No flame intended--just one man's opinion.
Don't you like the idea of a "place" that's yours alone? It's not dangerous (to you). It increases your choices. Your power. DCF "You don't have to be nice to nation states you meet on the way up if you're not coming back down."