17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
DD> In conclusion, I think random searching is the way to go. It's even better DD> than Monty's pre-allocation with quad-coverage. Here's a thought: How about the best of both worlds. Keep the double-coverage, bidirectional sweep, and allocate only one "team". The client software will take the pre-allocated segment, and then go random for the rest of the run. * GHOTI = FISH? touGH: GH = F wOmen: O = I dicTIonary: TI=SH. I love English! --- * Monster@FAmend.Com *