At 5:28 PM 7/30/97 -0400, Sandy Harris wrote:
. . . Perhaps more to the point, cancels conserve resources on newservers.
That is like saying "by decreasing the human population by mass murder, our resources are conserved." Censorship is not justified by stating that it causes the information to be reduced so as to lighten the load on a network.
...where on this scale do you start to object to my actions: 1) I use a killfile to ignore certain messages. 2) I program my personal newsserver to discard certain messages. 3) A group of us, by consensus, program our common newsserver...
Unanimous consent?
4) A system admin, with due notice to users, programs a newserver.....
What constitutes "due notice" in the present context? If an ISP were to advertise "Newsgroups censored through forgery", then that would be "due notice".
5) A group of admins agree to jointly program their newsservers so that some of them can cause all systems to discard messages.
Given the proposed "due notice" above, ISPs with such administrators are not likely to attract many customers. Jai Maharaj jai@mantra.com Om Shanti