cpsr.digex.net> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1993 08:48:10 +0000 From: Dave Banisar <banisar@washofc.cpsr.org> To: Cypherpunks@toad.com Subject: Re: Inman vs. crypto
Message-Id: <9312170947.AA18162@anon.penet.fi> To: cypherpunks@toad.com From: an41418@anon.penet.fi (wonderer) X-Anonymously-To: cypherpunks@toad.com Organization: Anonymous contact service Reply-To: an41418@anon.penet.fi Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1993 09:47:37 UTC Subject: Re: Inman vs. crypto
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I am almost positive Inman will be confirmed.
Boy, its a good thing that was posted anonymously. A real budding deep throat (grin) More recently, Inman was quoted by John Barlow in "Decrypting the Puzzle Palace" as saying ' "My Answer", he said "would be legislation which would make it a criminal offense to use encrypted communications to conceal criminal activity...you could have a registry of institutios which can legally use cryphers. If you get somebody using one who isn't registered, then you go after him." '