-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- The entity knows as Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com> probably wrote:
You can be sure that there will be rallying cries for laws to be passed to ensure the accuracy of statements made in key certificates, that characters are not defamed, that libel is not committed, etc... Lots of the same issues involving any other type of speech and the international and sometimes untraceable nature of the Net. What do you do about a signature on your key, posted anonymously to the net, which names you as one of the Four Horsemen(*tm)?
Hey, does that little symbol stand for "Timothy May-mark"? I didn't know he had started laying claim to memes that he helped propagate... But back to the actual subject, I can't imagine that an _anonymous signature_ will have any credence at all. Regards, Bryce -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2i Comment: Auto-signed under Unix with 'BAP' Easy-PGP v1.1b2 iQB1AwUBMaF7g0jbHy8sKZitAQFZUwL/dq4oX/MXqvJFp/VGv5hIOpbawnz8oSnA Vv5lIKperoZXg39ukzRjLRqzuursIlzeI23/aXSLRFKKZtVU/XFTeuZTor282aqB n49lduz070amEZFLCwXCO3iSksk0Y3wv =TGjr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----