-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I'm no lover of "liberals" (though for very different reasons from you, to be sure), but this is utter nonsense. Do people really believe this stuff?
Uhhm... Boy! Was I _that_ unclear about my meaning? It is a _virtue_ of strong cryptography that it reduces the effectiveness of governments. That's part of what cypherpunks is about. Or am I now misunderstanding you as badly as you apparently misunderstood me? No way did I intend to defend _any_ nation-state, _especially_ including any conducting wars on drugs or presuming to forbid the showing of a film or tapping the phones of dissidents. My point was that liberals are not automatically innocent of Statism and in fact have ample reason of their own to want an oppressive leviathan State. For this reason, strong cryptography threatens them as much as any other Statists. Freedom and cryptoanarchy are not on the liberal-conservative axis at all. John E. Kreznar | Relations among people to be by jkreznar@ininx.com | mutual consent, or not at all. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.3a iQCVAgUBLZyY6MDhz44ugybJAQFqWQP/XtDSGxb4LY3jnu6TnLgPCNzxQY7qIcuZ vLIIg7n0k9SCbCHATdhQnka6adYjc3wgpGq2T8cr9owjKI0bmdT/5eIB5s7jf+q4 UcIhsyuhte5hh/Ps3WE4Y1bjjzO/pXjU3kEts4gZKUqh7gEr/Lu9d3yzhwmk9jzL 7RMfxz0QeHY= =7dbi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----