In message <9405251315.AA06738@ next1.tem.nhl.nl >you write:
We'll try to make a nice new PGP 2.3c, which will be 100% compatible with the 2.6 version. (Bug fixes from 2.3 to 2.4 from Branko Lankester are already applied, now the compatibility problem will be to let 2.3 know it is 2.6)
Why not have that version advertize itself as 2.6? Then everyone would see a key that says its 2.6, and which would be legal (under different rules) worldwide. Linn H. Stanton <stanton@acm.org> The above opinions are exclusively my own. If anyone else wants them, they can buy them from me. Easy terms can be arranged. -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6 mQCNAi3iC/MAAAEEAOj2cr49PeFwa78Swqf3nBZHspCfZ+IgX8nGU8rbm2oJ6VYj u8o2M4c3Nv/tkoou24gDtM43/jSrRAalcX40pbGRqWJkkayJ52J8o4KupCrgsKLg fBE5P4tcUo9KaeJIaOfItJ2qrfTOcFuN7GiyTQ1E2/FGPSHDoqz3kXhxoZcNAAUR tCFMaW5uIEguIFN0YW50b24gPHN0YW50b25AYWNtLm9yZz4= =H8OV -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----