17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
brains@male.org writes:
Or to warn potential virus "authors" that *their* anonymity is no longer assured - not a bad thing. Not enough to justify the rest of it, IMHO, but certainly not Evil Incarnate (not to be flinging misinterpretations or aspersions :-)
Certainly not enough to justify the rest: Can you name one example of an author of a package including some virus? Not someone putting one post-production (individual signing will prevent that), but the original author? It's a straw man. -- L. Todd Masco | "Which part of 'shall not be infringed' didn't cactus@bb.com | you understand?"