-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- About "Keep Out": you might want to be more precise in your blurbs. As things stand, I'm leery of trusting anything I might see in your journal. From the keyboard of: John.Schofield@f903.n102.z1.fidonet.org (John Schofiel)
... Stories in progress for the first issue include: ... * A story on the breaking of RSA and what it really means in terms of the security of your messages
RSA is not broken, as far as I know. If you have verifiable details that it has, that'll be quite a scoop. If you meant to say "the _factoring_ of RSA-129," well, you should have said that instead.
* An interview with Phil Zimmermann, including his thoughts on privacy in the digital age, export controls on cryptography, the copyright o RSA (the algorithm used in PGP), and information on his struggle wit US Customs over exporting PGP
A publisher, of all people, really needs to understand what a copyright is. Note that we cannot copyright ideas, only our expression of those ideas. Referring to a copyright on "the algorithm used in PGP" is nonsense. Instead, PKP holds licensing rights to a system _patent_ on using RSA to perform public key encryption. Otherwise, your stuff sounds cool to me, though I'd really prefer that those who stand to get money for something not do their advertising via this list. Submitting boilerplate for comment is fine, but leave it to other interested parties to pass your advertising brochures to the list. Richard -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.3a-confuse-sternlight iQCVAgUBLfH/q/obez3wRbTBAQHPVQP+OqHntzDTwHttV1Mq8zLDR8kExiLyq6br uhJKIu3aSAQUEAiFge+UE03tR3w/ehnWvIcGfUJl4C0RQlLXl+aTdd7/q5F2V1Rp WpLu+8VVUviwIzAUbymjy8xxiZC/4lOx2WOoWCJSm40uiA4MwCI7zFu/trVW4B+V lFjz+mbiTSk= =TRhJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----