C'punks: On Thu, 30 Jun 1994, Anonymous User wrote:
I see an argument of "what do you need to protect so badly that Clipper cannot work? Are you doing something ILLEGAL? Clipper works, and only trusted law enforcement personell can use the keys, therefore there is no risk here.".
It is hard to explain to some liberal friends of mine . . .
For liberals, I would examine some pet cause and examine the consequences of that cause becoming "illegal." For instance, if your friends are "pro choice," you might ask them what they would do if the right to lifers outlawed abortion. Would they think it was wrong for a rape victim to get an abortion just because it was illegal? How would they feel about an abortion "underground railroad" organized via a network of "stations" coordinated via the Internet using "illegal encryption"? Or would they trust Clipper in such a situation? Everyone in America is passionate about something. Such passion usually dispenses with mere legalism, when it comes to what the believer feels is a question of fundamental right and wrong. Hit them with an argument that addresses their passion. Craft a pro-crypto argument that helps preserve the object of that passion. S a n d y