I am pleased to report on the performance of our two newest remailers, qwerty@netcom.com and nate@vis.colostate.edu. Both remailers had a very good response time. Here are the latest ping-times: Ping messages sent at Thu, 3 Feb 1994 17:49:24 -0500 (EST). Replies received: nobody@shell.portal.com 17:50:19 (+0:00:55) nobody@vangogh.VIS.ColoState.EDU 17:50:29 (+0:01:05) nobody@rosebud.ee.uh.edu 17:50:31 (+0:01:07) qwerty-remailer@netcom.com 17:50:33 (+0:01:09) catalyst-remailer@netcom.com 17:50:33 (+0:01:09) nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu 17:50:40 (+0:01:16) remailer-admin@chaos.bsu.edu 17:50:48 (+0:01:24) nobody@pmantis.berkeley.edu 17:51:08 (+0:01:44) nobody@soda.berkeley.edu 17:51:26 (+0:02:02) remailer@dis.org 18:27:51 (+0:38:27) nobody@cicada.berkeley.edu 18:28:05 (+0:38:41) nobody@jarthur.Claremont.EDU 20:54:25 (+3:05:01) The addresses of the above remailers are: hfinney@shell.portal.com catalyst@netcom.com elee7h5@rosebud.ee.uh.edu nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu remailer@chaos.bsu.edu hh@cicada.berkeley.edu hh@pmantis.berkeley.edu hh@soda.berkeley.edu ebrandt@jarthur.claremont.edu remailer@merde.dis.org qwerty@netcom.com nate@vis.colostate.edu This test did not include any of the special-purpose anonymous remailers. For a complete list of remailers, send mail to mg5n+remailers@andrew.cmu.edu. You will receive an automated reply.