On Sat, 16 Sep 1995, S. Keeling wrote:
Incoming from Rev. Ben:
On Thu, 14 Sep 1995, James A. Donald wrote:
If you draw a picture using paintbrush of an underage person engaging in sexual conduct, you are in violation of this proposed legislation.
Doesn't that directly contradict the stated purpose of existing child
[snip]
Do the lawyers on the list want to pipe up?
The current child pornography laws are entirely misguided and poorly written.
--
"Remember, obsolescence (Win95) isn't an accident; it's an art form!" keelings@wu1.wl.aecl.ca s. keeling, aecl - whiteshell labs
--- "In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti 00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information