-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Rishab wrote:
Someone:
I don't think so. It appears that the initial implementation of DigiCash works exactly that way [based on what I've read on their W3 server]. Of course, I could tell you more exactly had they replied to any of my four separate attempts to try it out ..
Interesting. I too have made four requests and still not received any software. Can you say "vapor?"
dave
It says very clearly at the DigiCash web site that the technology is NOT LICENSED FOR USE IN THE USA. I've been using the client quite happily from India; though I know for sure that US sites (eg. HotWired) have e-cash servers, there are obviously difficulties in using it there.
Not. What one page on their server (http://www.digicash.com/ecash/ecash-win.html) used to say was that there are two versions of the MS Windows client. One uses the PGP 2.3 MPI library, and that version is not licensed for US use; the other uses the RSAREF library, and, while slower, it's legal for US users. There's now only one choice for the MS Windows version-- I suspect that means that v2.02 and later use only the RSAREF library. Actually, there's not a separate ecash "server" per se. If you want to accept ecash payments (plug: check out my store at http://www.iquest.com/~fairgate), you just write a CGI script that calls the ecash client. Nothing much to it. - -Paul - -- Paul Robichaux, KD4JZG | Good software engineering doesn't reduce the perobich@ingr.com | amount of work you put into a product; it just Not speaking for Intergraph. | redistributes it differently. ### http://www.intergraph.com ### -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBLwLsnafb4pLe9tolAQEU9wP/Qfw3ooE36BThLZhJzA5c0mofxxok7NL+ 9Pkvv7erVsbad8wOC0gjOGDe+NHSznBPBjbMPITXJApSEJiEnmEJZNeBd3fWhhzL Ze0/p6FKUusHSkpjKos7kWvycg/Shkzhkplh/vil6We8fmBYG49l+f4EaBgIJEvh RgecCqkk8iQ= =r/d7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----