-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Rob writes:
I don't know if the revision is official or proposed. I first heard about it in a post to alt.security (I saved the message somewhere) which contained ref's in the federal register. I've seen other implementations that make the same fix.
The difference that when the expansion function is performed, it rolls the dword 1 bit left before putting it in the W[] array.
Any particular reason someone called this SHA-2 ? It sounds a whole lot like the revision of the original SHA, called SHA-1, that came out quite a while ago. (FIPS 180-1) This is rather old hat unless they're making a _second_ revision to the standard, in which case I expect there would have been much more noise made about it. Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQEVAwUBMQoL0inaAKQPVHDZAQGzmQf9FLDvD9TmpMfgDDac0xHsJX8RspJ/tIfS yMU6eoVSclD1hdQzMxkSc1ffPxvrLvCzILeFZVzZ/4duAp2wn1q4GPnQRvjXh98V GXVhHusiyB4RFWOsUewXt7r4aYtPeIZI51WEnRMXanCjcVU2ChukiruLAEQqC1JS nInfVMNjNkb1IHrltnwznnfqY91xBRzrABI1s8dRFXU/jUAI+jGr3ThfMipowvwh egbBkrhQJjlS3J9f2XL0rte0NDO5WxL5MrdR/N54ODI9ktrhWXWrAeK/NbA4tm6I uLrHq8FiI6HhqbrO7cEMMU2cuODv3Yu/0Z/MyD03C/uO1D0m1m1VRg== =zI2p -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----