nobody@replay.com (Name withheld on request) writes: FROM: THOMAS M. SMALL COUNSEL FOR RELIGIOUS TECHNOLOGY CENTER AND BRIDGE PUBLICATIONS, INC.
While the issue is interesting (using anonymous mailers to violate copyrights or to expose scams, depending on your view of the content), the apparent aim of the Scientologists isn't met by approaching the cypherpunk remailers: the specific anonymous postings have been through penet so far, I think.
Recent proposed legislation regarding potential liability of systems operators and others who provide facilities or services, such as annonymous remailers, for information passing through their systems has understanda> bly created concern on the part of systems operators as a potential liability. We ask your voluntary assistance in
You missplet "anonymous". Hope this helps. The only "proposed legislation" I know of was proposed by Martha Siegel, the greencard guru from CyberHell. Any others?
We ask that you confirm that you have blocked access to these newsgroups through your remailer. If you are unwilling to do so, we ask that you inform us as to the reasons for your position.
Yeah, right. People unclear on the concept of anonymous remailers. Maybe they should be talking to the mail-to-news forwarders instead. Jim Gillogly Highday, 13 Afteryule S.R. 1995, 19:06