On Sun, 01 Oct 1995 23:45:24 GMT, jbyrd@tiac.net (Jim Byrd) wrote: [snip]
-----------------begin control message Path: sundog.tiac.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!sunic!mn6.swip.net!seunet!news2..swip..net!plug..ne ws.pipex.net!pipex!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.gmi..edu!msunews!netnew s.upenn.edu!ts7-28.upenn.edu!user From: 73323.603@compuserve.com Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,soc.culture.jewish Subject: cmsg cancel <73323.603-3009951517290001@ts7-28.upenn.edu> Date: Sun, 1 Oct 1995 17:56 GMT Organization: The National Alliance Message-ID: <cancel.73323.603-3009951517290001@ts7-28.upenn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: ts7-28.upenn.edu Approved: 73323.603@compuserve.com Control: cancel <73323.603-3009951517290001@ts7-28.upenn.edu> X-Cancelled-By: 73323.603@compuserve.com Lines: 1
CANCELLED.
----end control message
Does this mean that the cancel came from the Compuserve account? Forging cancel notices is definitely against CIS rules, as is unsolicited e-mail. I've already talked to a sysop there about it, and he said he'd pass it along to the CIS Security folks. If nothing else, that may get his account revoked. Hey, small victories. Michael R. Grabois | orbit@ix.netcom.com Houston, TX | CI$: 74737,2600 ------------------------------------------------------- Gravity. It's not just a good idea, it's the law.