-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Perry E. Metzger writes:
John E. Kreznar says:
You would have to consent to be a national person (United States of America or Canada) in order to have it. You wouldn't want to give up your freeman status to do that, would you?
Given that to my knowledge no court, federal official, or other organization that counts recognises "freeman status" to my knowledge, it would seem to be a very small loss.
What they certainly _do_ recognize, however, is that a person who _does_ agree to the PGP 2.5 terms has affirmed that he _is_ a national person. This could be used by a court to negate any subsequent denial by the person that he is a subject of the United States of America or Canada. The absence on one's record of such affirmations is a prerequisite for freeman status. John E. Kreznar | Relations among people to be by jkreznar@ininx.com | mutual consent, or not at all. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.3a iQCVAgUBLdqRM8Dhz44ugybJAQFeKAP9EQPF8HucD5DUZ7x+ujnWxC4Td5uW/Wzy 6tQybwcBAwJuCenqWHDHdx5awGkANo9HTx63cD41rAls1rsXIyDRF2h2fTa1sLkM d6Soww9JG4PUAHGLFJvu1SCt13nBzotGrEpOp16c0y9QeW9yQ+QCFSnFq2bw75F4 zi1yarlYyQo= =Da9O -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----