Re: Another Son of Clipper discussion paper

At 16:36 9/5/95, Mike McNally wrote:

If the algorithm is public (and to stretch a point, if the executable makes it onto somebody's hard disk, it's effectively public), I don't really understand how the above can be made a realistic goal.

Windows 95 is on a lot of people's hard drives. It is therefore public and available for every one's inspection. How many people do you know that have reverse engineered Windows 95. How many of those use a reverse engineered version. I'd venture it is zero out of zero. -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred.