17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204) Well, it's easy to require people to include PGP signatures. And, as I've said, that's not what I'm talking about. On the other hand, how carefully were you planning to make your system check signatures - does toad.com have the spare cycles to validate them all, or are you really going for syntax only? Well, I was going to do syntax only, because the real benefit is in changing local software architecture to make automatic any operation on outgoing mail. If that operation is encryption, so much the better, but the larger strategic goal is to alter architecture. Eric