Blanc I respect your feelings on the matter and your ability to think clearly and with great foresight also :-), but for this list it would probably be much more useful if we got some _OFFICIAL_ answer from Microsoft instead of your "I believe, I cannot think, can't see", etc. etc. You're obviously a concerned individual but you equally obviously don't claim to speak for Microsoft. --JYL Blanc Weber writes:
From: Timothy C. May
My forte here on the list, I like to think, has always been to have "extremely long-range radar" that can pick up trends far in advance. Black Unicorn once told he this was my main strength, and even everybody's second-favorite nemesis, David Sternlight said much the same thing in sci.crypt. Coming from Sternlight, high praise indeed. <misc. elided> By all means, give Microsoft the benefit of the doubt. But also insist that they explain their work on SKE, and repudiate it. .........................................................
I respect your ability to think clearly and with great foresight also, Tim, but I really cannot think that Microsoft would "sell out" on this issue. There are too many in the company who would are for privacy for the individual, and remember they have their customers to think about. If SKE would constitute a problem for the individual end-user, then I can't see how the company could implement it and expect to remain a leader in the business, with all the negative publicity it would generate (conceivably most of it from cypherpunks!). These are my thoughts based on what I know about attitudes around here that I am familiar with & certain of.
As I said in another post, Microsoft is an expert at arriving at a "win-win" situation, but I don't believe this includes sacrificing some of our most cherished values, like personal privacy, in exchange for a little security. If I thought this was not true, *I* would not work here.
I may sound naive; hope time does not prove me wrong.
Blanc