From: Graham Toal <gtoal@an-teallach.com> I think this is the way to go, and I don't think we need special groups for it either. Tim, just as an experiment, post a message to any group you like (except netcom ones!) with 'gtoal' in it somewhere (innocuously, like in a .sig), and I'll show you how easy it is to find stuff that's addressed to you.
Mass kibozing is certainly an option for the receiver, but I think this scheme is going to provoke loud complaints from most sysadmins if it ever gets off the ground. I agree with Karl's comments re "havens" that it's unnecessary to look at "if the whole planet did that, the net would implode" scenarios. But sending encrypted private mail to Usenet would become problematic even with light use, a few hundred or a thousand people. A thousand people times 50 messages per day is already 50,000 daily -- what's Usenet's daily traffic these days? And anon.penet.fi has more than a thousand active users, and I get a lot more than 50 messages a day. There are social strictures in place against broadcasting private mail via Usenet, except possibly as a last resort. If you encourage people to put encrypted chunks on every system in the world so one person can read them, you will probably be held in the same regard as Canter and Siegel. If you want to promote this, please don't say anything about "cypherpunks"... Eli ebrandt@hmc.edu