To clear this up.

Something needs clearing up: I am not a Judges-L sympathizer. The previous message was posted at the request of David Stodolsky. I am subscribed to the list to see what is going on. I find the idea of the Judges-L to be repulsive, personally, as I have told DS and others. I saw no harm in relaying this message to the list. All it is likely to do is create more anti-Judges-L sentiment. David Stodolsky claims that they have no desire to hide their FAQ, but that he wishes for it to be distributed in a controlled fashion. To engage in what I deem "fair use": "...disclosure in the wrong context, or at the wrong time can cause trouble..." A beaut. In sum, I find Judges-L repulsive and plan to keep an eye on it. -Craig Johnston