From: IN%"71332.747@CompuServe.COM" "James Hicks" 18-DEC-1993 11:04:13.14 To: IN%"miniters@citadel.edu" "Syl Miniter" CC: Subj: ViaCrypt Syl, I saw your question on the Cypherpunks mail list. Recently Dave Barnhart, the ViaCrypt product manager (for Lemcon Systems) became active on Compuserve's Electronic Frontier Forum. The following is a statement he left in the forums message section. He appears more than willing (even eager) to answer questions about ViaCrypt and can be contacted at the addresses given in his message. James |>----------------------------------------------------------------------<| |PGP 2.x Key ID: F9A281 Fingerprint <F2A1A42B 67408691 5A6A2F0F C1104457>| |>----------------------------------------------------------------------<| *========================================================================* From: Dave Barnhart (ViaCrypt), 70275,1360 70275.1360@compuserve.com Date: Thu, Dec 2, 1993, 8:45:16 PM [PST] ViaCrypt is a division of a 17-year old company named Lemcom Systems. Lemcom Systems has traditionally produced IBM mainframe communication controllers and other network products. About 1989, we began producing a network product that used DES (That's about the only kind of encryption that IBM will admit exists). About 2 years ago, the ViaCrypt division was formed to develop products incorporating public key cryptography for the PC, UNIX, and workstation market. About 1 year ago, ViaCrypt sub-licensed the RSA patents from Public Key Partners (PKP). Late last summer (1993), we were introduced to Phil Zimmermann, author pf PGP. Phil expressed an interest in finding a way to commercially market PGP. Together with our law firm, one of the coutry's formost experts on intellectual property rights, we examined the terms of our PKP sub-license to determine if ViaCrypt could market a commercial version of PGP, and if so, under what conditions. At the same time, we also investigated obtaining a sub-license for the IDEA cipher from Ascom Tech AG in Switzerland. The opinion was that we could market PGP provided: 1) we substituted ViaCrypt-written RSA code for the existing RSA code in PGP. 2) we did not supply source code. So in late September we signed an agreement with Phil Zimmermann to market the commercial version of PGP, which we chose to call ViaCrypt PGP. Except for the RSA routines, a couple of bug-fixes provided by Phil, and a change in the "welcome banner", the code in ViaCrypt PGP is identical to that found in PGP 2.3a. This means that it is interoperable with PGP 2.3a. Except for the aforementioned changes, we made no other changes or additions to the PGP 2.3a source to produce ViaCrypt PGP 2.4 for MS-DOS. Why would you buy ViaCrypt PGP instead of using the 'freeware' PGP? First, many small businesses and large corporations have expressed a great deal of interest in using PGP, but have not done so because of the legal exposure from RSA. ViaCrypt PGP removes this problem. As for the individual, Dr Hugh Miller said it best on USENET, but I won't quote him here without his permission. Essentially, it's your chance to "stand up and be counted" on the subject of how you want your encryption. It's the best chance we may have to say: 1. "We don't like the rigid, hierarchical trust model in PEM", and: 2. "We don't want any system incorporating key escrow (a la clipper)" ViaCrypt PGP version 2.4 for MS-DOS is available from: ViaCrypt 2104 W. Peoria Ave Phoenix, AZ 85029 Phone (602) 944-0773 FAX (602) 943-2601 Internet: wk01965@worldlink.com Compuserve: 70304,41 Price: $99.98 (single user) $299.98 (five users) $824.98 (20 users) Plus $8.00 S & H, (and if you live in a small number of states, I can't remember which ones, they make us collect sales tax.) We intend to have ViaCrypt PGP available for just about every platform on the planet. We should be announcing the availability of ViaCrypt PGP for several UNIX platforms shortly. I hope to have MAC and Windows versions available some time in the second quarter of 1994. And I know it doesn't make for a great story, but at the CSI Computer Security Conference in Anaheim a month ago, Phil Zimmermann was in our booth (we asked him to come). Jim Bidzos was at the same conference, making a presentation. There were no bloody brawls in the hallway, no shouting matches, I don't think the two even encountered each other. The rest of the folks at the RSA booth stopped by, and were actually quite cordial. ho hum. I apologize for the length of this message, but I hope it answers everyone's questions. If not, ask away, or feel free to contact me at ViaCrypt. (If you call ViaCrypt with questions, I'm the one you'll probably talk to, by the way.) Best Regards, David Barnhart ViaCrypt Product Manager Return-path: <71332.747@CompuServe.COM> Received: from dub-img-1.compuserve.com by citadel.edu (PMDF V4.2-11 #4957) id <01H6MFHZXKKG9AOW3X@citadel.edu>; Sat, 18 Dec 1993 11:04:14 EST Received: from localhost by dub-img-1.compuserve.com (8.6.4/5.930129sam) id LAA11648; Sat, 18 Dec 1993 11:04:58 -0500 Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1993 11:01:43 -0500 (EST) From: James Hicks <71332.747@CompuServe.COM> Subject: ViaCrypt To: Syl Miniter <miniters@citadel.edu> Message-id: <931218160143_71332.747_DHQ64-1@CompuServe.COM> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT