Declan McCullagh said:
BTW, Will R did a piece a month or so ago on Denning's shifting stance. Maybe I should call her up and press her for details.
While your at it why not ask if she (see her post to this list dated 1 Sep 1996; and several EFF board members referred to in John Gilmores post to this list on 2 Sep 1996) are still having problems with anonymity. I didn't think she was a GAKer way back then so who knows which way the wind is blowing her now. Garfinkel refers to her long held belief that controls on encryption were necessary so perhaps I am wrong and she was a GAKer all along although her reference in her email of 1 Sep makes no mention of it when she sought to distinguish her comments on anonymity from the issue of encryption thus: "Please note that this is not the same as the right to *private* conversations and the use of encryption; this is the issue of being accountable for what you publish in public." Then again her comments appeared to be a slipery as an eel in terms of meaning so who knows what the hell she means/meant/will mean at any particular point in time. -- .////. .// Charles Senescall apache@bear.apana.org.au o:::::::::/// apache@quux.apana.org.au
::::::::::\\\ Finger me for PGP PUBKEY Brisbane AUSTRALIA '\\\\\' \\ Apache