What really constitutes a remailer (pseudo-anonymous vs anonymous arguments aside)? For example, the other day I received a message from 66west.com saying that I had a greeting card waiting, I was to go to a certain URL and enter a simple password to retreive my "greeting card". Now this card had no return address, no name. Could this constitute a remailer? A while back there was a thread on how to take some of the responsibility off of the remailer operators (the last one in the chain more so), could this be a viable alternative? (Actually, I believe it was discussed). As for tracking, I'm sure the server logs are rotated often, and are not kept forever (our student page server here rotates daily and logs are kept for 4 days AFAIK), so perhaps this may even be less traceable. Using these greeting cards, what prohibits me from sending a letter instead of "happy birthday"? Will the anti-remailer people crack down on this also? I can just see the law "Thou shalt not send greeting cards via email without photoID" :-) Sean ------------------------------------------------------------------ Sean Walberg umwalber@cc.umanitoba.ca The Web Guy http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~umwalber UNIX Group, U. of Manitoba PGP Key Available from Servers