Latency vs. Reordering (Was: Remailer ideas (Was: Re: Latency vs. Reordering))

Back to the start, I guess.

Specifically cryptographic elements are easily added to the system * packets can be delayed for random intervals

Let me repeat: REORDERING IS OF PRIMARY IMPORTANCE FOR REMAILER SECURITY. ADDING LATENCY IS NOT. And I don't want to hear any excuses that you can say latency and mean reordering, because that's self-delusion. Not only is it false, but misleading. Reordering is necessary for security, and latency is a by-product. You don't get security by adding by-products. Eric