Matt Blaze writes:
It seems best to encourage the realistic side of NSA as much as possible...
James Donald writes:
Why? Surely the realists are more dangerous than the nuts.
At 03:57 AM 10/5/95 -0400, Futplex wrote:
(I'm assuming that a Realistic Agenda has at least as good a chance of success as a Nutty Agenda. [...] )
Language problem: If that is the case, then the "Nutty Agenda" is perfectly sane. They want to rule over us. There is nothing crazy about that. Evil yes. Crazy no. Their objective is to create a surveillance state, where all actions are known and recorded by the state, in order to facilitate detailed state control over every aspect of our lives. Our agenda is the opposite. There is no commonality of purpose, hence no possibility of cooperation. --------------------------------------------------------------------- | We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/ and our property, because of the kind | of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald derives from this right, not from the | arbitrary power of the state. | jamesd@echeque.com