-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In <Pine.LNX.3.95.970717175139.11493B-100000@vorlon.mit.edu>, on 07/17/97 at 05:51 PM, Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu> said: Declan, I sniped this from your forwarded post:
White 1995 White House 1997 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Content Regulations imposed No content regulations, no law by Congress on all Internet or regulation of Net, no requiement Publishers. to label or rate content.
Criminal Penalties for No criminal penalties for anything display of Harmful To besides trafficing in child Minors Material w/o good pornography, obscenity or faith effort to block stalking kids online (illegal before kids access CDA)
Do you have any docs or transcripts from the meeting with the White House? What is being claimed above about the current proposal and what I ahve been hearing here are two differnet things. It was my understnding that the current proposal was very much like the White proposal in '95. Any clairifcation you can provide on this matter would be appreciated. Thanks, - -- - --------------------------------------------------------------- William H. Geiger III http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0 Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail. OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html - --------------------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3a Charset: cp850 Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000 iQCVAwUBM86PuI9Co1n+aLhhAQGs9wP/RPNSdQxvRvWgThjPGWG6wbS0m4wyjaPz K1psZ+UZwsng3htjbo9KF023NfQMJo4+soQk7UkZiD8du4WejBQWA6epGmM6/MB7 12FwSwnRz0EmruUrC7sGYq3TcG2f3DP2mEF5znQjcCYKnbn0nmcYFpSQJc+Hy/nR gcVOqvaW4gI= =C+sN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----