-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Thu, 31 Jul 1997, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au> writes:
Nno one is arugeing that. Both sides in this debait aggry that that is a REAL BAD thing. Spam cancelers use an objective rules.
[...]
Let me clarify two things:
1. "Spam cancellers" are not generally news admins.
I think you will have to justerfy this, the top spam cancellers are all news adimns.
2. Once a cancel-forger builds a "reputation" as a "spam canceller", s/he often diversifies into "retromodetration"
There is little proof that this is the case. Even the netscum case could have been considered spam. [...]
Not even forgeries in my name? Not even out of the control spews from fidonet?
Correct.
Ok so if a mailing list gateway @bwalk.dm.com pumps thousands of broken posts into usenet you don't wish them to be removed from usenet? Nor if I post a message with your name and email, saying "Chris Lewis the best thing that happened to usenet and I wish to have his baby." If this is so sould I change the RB to reflect this. Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia see the url in my header. Never trust a country with more peaple then sheep. ex-net.scum and proud You Say To People "Throw Off Your Chains" And They Make New Chains For Themselves? --Terry Pratchett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBM+GTWKQK0ynCmdStAQERNQP+OlKyKfBQl0YOb3hBRipLXHfvnLSdhnWY HF91PySz5wikYaF046efV+SeIN7+cMPj8+LPdYMvft8Wy/gQMU6Sjp8hVFz4l5kN 4ygAihiDmHXWsDbvpksiSuJBodvvE/EnSqrulpEYfJ2KNb33dCDfuoo8ARk5DZhD +5l3c9SPDek= =50wo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----