Brian Davis wrote:
On Fri, 8 Dec 1995, Black Unicorn wrote:
You've taken the narrow answer I was trying to give out of context. As for fifth amendment questions, That's another discussion entirely. If this was not an error, then you have still taken the question way beyond the narrow scope I was addressing.
You are correct: I didn't realize/remember/whatever that you were limiting the remarks to the narrow scope you set forth below. And on the point you were addressing, I agree with you.
Sorry to have added the fog ...
Not a problem I could have been clearer.
Not a lawyer on the Net, although I play one in real life. ********************************************************** Flame away! I get treated worse in person every day!!
--- My prefered and soon to be permanent e-mail address: unicorn@schloss.li "In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti 00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information