17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
What do you mean by "per se"? That it might be covered by the Stanford patents? (Those are the ones that allegedly cover all public-key, right?)
David Mazieres writes:
Isn't Rabin's algorithm patented, too?
There is no patent on Rabin per se.
.pm
-- Sameer Parekh Voice: 510-601-9777x3 Community ConneXion, Inc. FAX: 510-601-9734 The Internet Privacy Provider Dialin: 510-658-6376 http://www.c2.net/ (or login as "guest") sameer@c2.net