You made the assertion in your rebuttal about area -v- volume in relation to black holes and event horizons about the entire universe not being containable in a volumn, if you accept this premice then you have to accept the premice that the universe is unbouded and hence not containable. This leads the bounds on the B-equation to be infinitly large number of possible states.
So what's wrong with that?
Jay
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am an attorney, seeking a position in the area of Computer Law. If you know of such a position available, or of someone who may know of such a position, please send e-mail! Thanks.
If you accept the universe as unbounded then you have to throw out the Big Bang and much of conventional physics, including large parts of what you are trying to prove.