Arthur Chandler wrote:
Isn't it tough enough to build up a rep under our real names? What is the point to using a pseudonym? I can think of some bad reasons; but I can't come up with any good ones, except for "fun" and "just to see what it feels like to put out opinions not my own." I'm sure I'm missing the point; so, before you jump on me as a Clueless Newbie, can you run by the reasons why you want to have alternate personas on the NET?
It's not a dumb questions, and it comes up from time to time. In fact, this was the subject of a lengthy war on news.admin.policy a while ago. You could use a pseudonym anytime you don't want to be linked to an opinion. Maybe you don't want to be known as the author of a post to alt.sex about whether you shower with your spouse; maybe you feel less embarrassed asking questions like Wonderer; perhaps you want to engage in a serious debate over touchy political issues; etc. In these examples, you would be putting out opinions that are your own - you just want the freedom of speaking without fearing retribution or ridicule. After all, you may irritate someone who decides to cause you harm. This won't ever happen, you say? Maybe, but here's an example: Salmon Rushdie, author of the "Satanic Verses" is still living in fear of his life. You can whistle-blow. Some months ago a local paper ran a series of articles on people who had the careers and lives destroyed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, because they reported various unsafe practices and violations at their workplace. Small examples of anonymity are in our life already: most radio shows don't broadcast your last name, papers will withhold names from editorial pieces sent them, police departments take anonymous tips. The protection a pseudonym affords is more powerful. -- Karl L. Barrus: klbarrus@owlnet.rice.edu keyID: 5AD633 hash: D1 59 9D 48 72 E9 19 D5 3D F3 93 7E 81 B5 CC 32 "One man's mnemonic is another man's cryptography" - my compilers prof discussing file naming in public directories