17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
Incoming from Rev. Ben:
On Thu, 14 Sep 1995, James A. Donald wrote:
If you draw a picture using paintbrush of an underage person engaging in sexual conduct, you are in violation of this proposed legislation.
Doesn't that directly contradict the stated purpose of existing child
[snip]
Do the lawyers on the list want to pipe up?
On cypherpunks?!? Whatever for? I imagine there's already a rousing discussion going on about this somewhere in AOL. Take it there. -- "Remember, obsolescence (Win95) isn't an accident; it's an art form!" keelings@wu1.wl.aecl.ca s. keeling, aecl - whiteshell labs