I just saw a glaring error in this article which Dana forwards to us which needs correcting: At 9:19 PM 10/23/95, Dana W. Albrecht wrote:
Forwarded from sci.crypt:
In article <45t9oh$6vd@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, whmurray@aol.com (WHMurray) writes:
In article <45qkp5$8rh@netaxs.com>, grendel@netaxs.com (Michael Handler) writes:
OTOH, I saw a press-release on Cypherpunks a week or two back that claimed Whitfield Diffie and David Kahn had both examined the algorithm under NDA, and both were blown away by it. OTOOH, I don't know how much Diffie and Kahn know about TCP/IP.
Diffie knows enough; Kahn less. However, both are geniuses and know what they need to know. As to their being "blown away," I tend to doubt it. The idea is useful but not revolutionary.
It was Winn Schwartau, not Whit Diffie, who gave the rave review. Schwartau wrote the book "Information Warfare," as well as a novel about hacking, and is not a professional cryptologist. --Tim May Views here are not the views of my Internet Service Provider or Government. ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay@got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Higher Power: 2^756839 | black markets, collapse of governments. "National borders are just speed bumps on the information superhighway."