-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hello, "Vladimir Z. Nuri" <vznuri@netcom.com> wrote:
yes, cyberspace just doesn't have enough acronyms like AFAIK and IANAL etc. ad nauseam. (I have reason to believe that PTB, or "powers that be" was ... SHTBD!!!!
as in, Something Has To Be Done. ...
Proposed extension: SHTBD/<agent> eg: There's a paedophile on the Internet! SHTBD/PTB! PTB're trying to regulate cyberspace! SHTBD/EFF! PTB're pushing GAK! SHTBD/C'punks! And so on. After all, all sides can cry "SHTBD", can't they? (Home users may prefer the alternate syntax SHTBD\<agent>, ie SHTBD\PTB, SHTBD\EFF, SHTBD\C_PUNKS etc :-) ...
used either seriously or satirically (probably mostly satirically by everyone here).
example: ... "I was not implying that SHTBD, merely that we are moving into a brave new world in cyberspace".
How about something like: "I was not implying that SHTBD/PTB to stop it, but that SHTBD/us to support it/deploy it/get ready for it." ...
notice that SHTBD is the antithesis of cypherpunk philosophy in that it tends to imply
1. government intervention
Hence the addition of the <agent> field...
2. coercive force 3. censorship ...
Yet one of your examples implied the opposite - sorry, I nuked it, but it was about the media picking bogeymen. ...
hence by using this term and popularizing it, we promote our own agenda of "cryptoanarchy". ...
Fortunately for the anarchists, perhaps, an authoritarian government is isomorphic to anarchy. Jiri - -- If you want an answer, please mail to <jirib@cs.monash.edu.au>. On sweeney, I may delete without reading! PGP 463A14D5 (but it's at home so it'll take a day or two) PGP EF0607F9 (but it's at uni so don't rely on it too much) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2i iQCVAwUBMOIXESxV6mvvBgf5AQEOBQQA7ShSGoioMAb6CF5ot0sxu57hvBwMDJDw MmkBLnPXvoYaL8dOEc5uYhdtLa8hkPapXT3NEUywI1SDDx7QUc4YgbzfQCQNAgz0 HYlfUlL1SA1N7JQIiyHEBN+jWaldzEGGflLxJPy83vm4N1pyo0gluzzi2hMJigcD FgU3G8LjcoE= =aBT9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----