On Tue, 12 Mar 1996, Dr. Dimitri Vulis wrote:
jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com> writes:
At 02:38 PM 3/12/96 -0800, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
Hey, Jim, don't forget me. You are the only person I have ever specifically UNinvited to one of my parties in over a decade of hosting same. I guess that makes you special.
You're confused. You're describe YOUR reaction to ME, not MY reaction to YOU. And I am unaware of being invited to a "party," and now that I've discovered what a sleazy person Alan Olsen and his merry band are, it is really doubtful that I would have enjoyed what was advertised as a cypherpunks meeting, but which you now claim was a "party." Your level of "honesty" is showing.
"Cypherpunk" is not a trademarked name. I've seen people say on this list (paraphrased) "I'm a cypherpunk, and I oppose unrestricted free speech because we must silence {homophobes}child pornographers|terrorists}" or "I'm hosting a cypherpunks meeting and X will not be permitted to come because I don't like his political views". I like reading this list,
You're a cypherpunk then. --- My prefered and soon to be permanent e-mail address: unicorn@schloss.li "In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti 00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information