-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- - ------------
The NSA is more than capable enough to ignore NSA fodder, I would think. If you want to write something that'll get looked at by a human, you'll have to write the kind of thing that's likely to make you the target of an investigation: "Tim, the supplier screwed up--the .5 Kg Pu shipment ain't
On the "Tommy the Tourist" tag lines. To use a netticism, "<shrug>."
The modern Net and the modern NSA will not be fooled for any significant amount of time by such naughty words. In fact, I'm sure they now have a set of filters for ignoring such blatant bait.
-- .......................................................................... Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay@netcom.com | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
Yes, presumably the NSA (etc) has filters to deal with such spook lines, however it must be irritating to have to include filters, and lose the efficiency of plain string searches. A large enough number of messages with the words NSA Plutonium AK-47 bomb interspersed means having to include filters, human and automated. As long as people come up with new ways to frustrate their filters, rather than just append a fixed set of words to the final lines of their message, then they have to waste (comparatively) valuable programmers and CPU time keeping their scanners up to date. Only irritating, true, but I reserve the right to irritate such buggers :-) -^- <amck@maths.tcd.ie> | Alastair McKinstry Finger or mail me for PGP Public Key PGP Key fingerprint = 1B F3 57 DB 83 4B 0C 63 32 A0 7C A9 E7 23 43 EB When the going gets wierd, the wierd turn pro -- HST -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.3a iQCVAgUBLlCj/TzDKcCV/ZSpAQFjaQP/T7PL1wI7pi8I4S8K88jkYmPeasIyTDot bEbZhlOcRYUfOqlDFWsF6UdLwPpw91KjmTskMLCvnnUF5QysDQJeFW/PCemKfzux bDLYellNy9d0Ihs0+0V4nUTioeaVCGqU2+3mkrP77IsEVrHA6jaKrLC4YY1YF2mW G5tQHgqSId4= =g9R/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----