I'm sort of fuzzy on the distinction between pseudonymous and pseudoanonymous; is it that a pseudonym is obviously so? For example, [...] Now, pseudoanonymous is when a fake identity is created, without it being obviously so. (Right?) So if I were to obtain another account with a different user name, etc. and use that account, I would be pseudospoofing. (?)
I have pointed this out numerous times to L.D. in private mail, but he doesn't seem to get the fact that "obvious" is completely subjective. The most recent example I gave was that "James Bond" would appear to be an obvious pseudo. Unless your name really IS James Bond (which is actually not that rare of a name), or you happen to be someone that's never seen a J.B. movie, or read an Ian Fleming book, such as, say, a guy from Norway or Japan, in which case it would be quite reasonable to presume that the person you just got mail from really is named James Bond. Detweiler's entire proposition hinges on this distinction between pseudonymy and "pseudoanonymity"/"pseudospoofing". The distinction does not actually clearly exist, and his premise (or I should say "its" premise, since Detweiler has lately claimed to be female) collapses. I have attempted to get this to sink in to it's head, but to no avail; it just keeps posting and mailing away. What can ya do? I for one may just add someone to my kill file for the first time ever, as I'm sick to death of the same 200 line rant, rearranged and given a new title, popping up in my list mail, private mail, and news several times a day. Detweiler is not really in a position to complain about letterbombing. Aside from that, I recommend just ignoring it until unless it posts something of relevance and interest. -- Stanton McCandlish mech@eff.org 1:109/1103 EFF Online Activist & SysOp O P E N P L A T F O R M C R Y P T O P O L I C Y O N L I N E R I G H T S N E T W O R K I N G V I R T U A L C U L T U R E I N F O : M E M B E R S H I P @ E F F . O R G