-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Disclaimer: This document assumes that MIME is an OK thing and a possible tool for bringing crypto to the masses. It does not assume anything about the current state of affairs concerning MIME mailers; rather, it serves as a possible impetus for code. Critical posts of a non-technical nature ("MIME sucks, you moron!") will be ignored. Watching the MIME flame wars, I was intrigued by the references quoted concerning PEM-MIME and so on, leading me to a great deal of research with an eye to writing some PGP-MIME kinds of tools. In doing this, I happened upon a post by Mr. Borenstein in comp.mail.mime stating, in effect, that the previous draft standard of application/pgp was a dead end. I also noticed that Mr. Borenstein called for volunteers to write a draft standard to integrate PGP into the PEM-MIME scheme developed at the last IETF meeting. This seems like a golden opportunity to give mail vendors a "push" to integrate PGP with their mailers, so I thought I'd mention it here in case someone was interested who might have missed the comp.mail.mime post. I've noticed Mr. Borenstein's presence here in cypherpunks; I invite him to clarify or update as needed. I'd also volunteer to work on the draft, except that my qualifications to do so are about as low as you get on a list like this one, and I'm sure that just about anyone else would probably be more qualified. However, if no one else is interested, I'll do what I can! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBLvWezjER5KvPRd0NAQF+CwP8DpQlFv/VtZ4N02nUfnklIsoT/63qvnBG E0H2d/juUtK6Op4hcwexGlxF5fm7KDyMFXCYyvogQ2c8UxI1wcR5fGXZVpmNSRwk K8xhIX96jZRrI7ZyG4M5uhCXwgmXN2KM7bldgJscezOdUcINFoa8QGSCBNSZOhdD urFUFVyvwzM= =TAD0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----