[wwpolicy] Fwd: Mailing list for standards discussions?

[William Fishburne]

I'm, frankly, overwhelmed by the PGWW stuff, so I miss the policy discussions.  I think this would be a good spot also to look for archives of policy so that new volunteers could come here.  Recently, I had to try to rehash the XML debate for someone really interested in converting everything into XML and then generating HTML, txt, PDF, etc. dynamically.

Another good reason is so that when there is a question, there is only one place to search...here!

So, that's my reasoning.

Brett

P.S.--Opera doesn't really let me handle the move to a folder as well from the mailing lists (or I haven't figured it out).  It is what I used to do, but Opera is so useful in so many other ways that I let that one fall through the cracks and didn't notice it until I tried to fix makehead to handle the posting options.  Which I still haven't done.  sigh.

On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:39:38 +0200, Carlo Traverso <traverso at dm.unipi.it> wrote:

>>>>>> "David" == David Price <ccx074 at coventry.ac.uk> writes:
>
>     David> [Long bit snipped about new lists and then Jim writes:]
>
>     >> Ah. I just got it.
>     >>
>     >> You see, I filter all the upload messages into a separate
>     >> mailbox. Then, whatever pgww messages don't fall into that are
>     >> for discussion
>
>     David> I do just the same - the uploads get filtered to one
>     David> folder, what remains needs looking at.  A truely brilliant
>     David> idea I think - after all both Jim and me do it!
>
> Me three. But the mailman archives do not filter, so I think that
> wwpolicy is a good idea (although I'll mix with the pgww less uploads
> anyway).
>
> Carlo
>
> _______________________________________________
> wwpolicy mailing list
> wwpolicy at lists.pglaf.org
> http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/wwpolicy
>