[UR-WG] extending Usage Records

[Donal K. Fellows]

Pontz, Tobias wrote:
> thanks for your reply. You are right with jsdl:ApplicationName, but
> it was just an ad-hoc example...

No problem. :-)

> So it is not possible to extend the urf with xml elements (perhaps as
> children of another element than resource (I can't see any))?

Not without extra schema games.

> Perhaps it makes sense to add the "any" element to the schema (e.g.
> at resource) to be more flexible?

That's a schema change. :-) Whether or not the UR schema should have
such things in it, it does not currently actually do so.

Donal.