[ur-wg] Mailing List Discussions: Comment #5b

[Sven van den Berghe]

I agree with the suggestions in that email, provided that there is more
than a single level of composition i.e. composite jobs can be parts of
higher-level composite jobs.

On 5 May 2006, at 10:21, Donal K. Fellows wrote:

> Sven van den Berghe wrote:
>> Isn't all we need just a simple nesting e.g.
>> All Jobs are composites of 1 or more Jobs. A Usage Record may contain
>> a reference to one parent Job (rename GlobalJobId to ParentjobId)
>> This handles URs for each node of jobs on clusters, URs for workflows
>> and also Grid Jobs.
>
> See my message from 27 April. :-)
> In summary, a composite would be
> useful, but it should probably be labelled as and mean just that.
>
> Donal.

Sven

Sven.vandenBerghe at uk.fujitsu.com
Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe
+44 208 606 4651