[ur-wg] Mailing List Discussions: Comment #3c

Donal K. Fellows donal.k.fellows at manchester.ac.uk
Thu May 4 16:17:18 CDT 2006


Laura F McGinnis wrote:
>>     3c)     Section 3.18: ProjectName fits well in Grid projects like LHC and 
>> EGEE, but not in terms of virtual organisations which form a natural 
>> grouping. We recommend an additional field called 
>> "VirtualOrganisation" or "VO".
>>
>> Evaluation: Defer discussion to mailing list

My main objection to a VirtualOrganization name field is figuring out
how to make that have even the slightest chance of being interoperable.
Should it be a string (if so, what is in the string), a URL (pointing to
what), a complex type (containing what) or ...?

Donal.





More information about the ur-wg mailing list