[ur-wg] Mailing List Discussions: Comment #3c
Donal K. Fellows
donal.k.fellows at manchester.ac.uk
Thu May 4 16:17:18 CDT 2006
Laura F McGinnis wrote:
>> 3c) Section 3.18: ProjectName fits well in Grid projects like LHC and
>> EGEE, but not in terms of virtual organisations which form a natural
>> grouping. We recommend an additional field called
>> "VirtualOrganisation" or "VO".
>>
>> Evaluation: Defer discussion to mailing list
My main objection to a VirtualOrganization name field is figuring out
how to make that have even the slightest chance of being interoperable.
Should it be a string (if so, what is in the string), a URL (pointing to
what), a complex type (containing what) or ...?
Donal.
More information about the ur-wg
mailing list